Probability notation for odds
If you’ve ever walked into a bookmaker,
or looked at betting sites like Betfair or William Hill,
you’ll have seen odds,
possibly in multiple notations.
Here I show what these notations mean,
and how to convert them to a better notation called probability.
To take an example,
Liverpool are playing Tottenham tomorrow.
For this match,
WilliamHill.com shows me the following odds:
Selection | Fractional Odds |
Tottenham to win | 5/1 |
Liverpool to win | 11/20 |
Draw | 16/5 |
The numbers in that table, like “11/20” are fractional odds.
Odds of 11/20 mean that, if you spend $20,
and Liverpool win,
you will receive back $11 plus your original $20 -
and if Liverpool don’t win,
you receive nothing.
Fractional odds are not directly comparable,
because both numbers in the notation can change.
For example, which odds are better, 11/20 or 33/60?
Neither: they’re the same!
Because of this,
many bookmakers now use decimal notation.
On WilliamHill.com,
you can toggle this on,
in which case you get:
Selection | Decimal Odds |
Tottenham to win | 6.00 |
Liverpool to win | 1.55 |
Draw | 4.20 |
Decimal notation like “1.55” means,
if you spend $1,
and Liverpool win,
you will receive back $1.55 (but not plus your original $1).
So to convert fractional odds like N/M to decimal,
calculate (M+N)/M.
But there is a still better notation: probability!
Consider buying “Liverpool to win” at decimal 1.55 -
i.e., spending $1 for a possible $1.55 return.
Imagine you believe it’s 80% likely that Liverpool will win.
Then you have an 80% chance of gaining 55¢ ($1.55 minus your $1 stake),
and only a 20% chance of losing $1.
Then your expected gain is 80%×55¢ + 20%×-$1 = 24¢.
It’s a positive expected gain, so you should take that bet!
Probability notation shows the probability at which
taking the bet gives you an expected gain of $0.
The probability is the inverse of the decimal notation.
For example, decimal 1.55 becomes 1/1.55 = 0.645 = 64.5%.
Now see these odds with probability notation:
Selection | Probability |
Tottenham to win | 16.7% |
Liverpool to win | 64.5% |
Draw | 23.8% |
Total: | 105% |
At last,
a key property of these odds becomes clear:
they add to (approximately) 100%!
This is because,
of the three events (win, lose or draw),
exactly one will occur.
But why do these odds add to 105%, not 100%?
This is because William Hill are gaming you!
William Hill have their own private beliefs in the probabilities of these events,
from which they generate odds that give William Hill an expected positive gain.
By analysis of several games,
the total percentage is always between 105% and 108%.
Why don’t bookmakers use this percentage notation?
One reason is that, by using fractional or decimal odds,
it’s less clear that they’re swindling you.
But, recently, some markets do use this notation!
Smarkets.com
shows probabilities alongside decimal odds.
Similar posts
More by Jim
What does the dot do in JavaScript?
foo.bar
, foo.bar()
, or foo.bar = baz
- what do they mean? A deep dive into prototypical inheritance and getters/setters. 2020-11-01
Smear phishing: a new Android vulnerability
Trick Android to display an SMS as coming from any contact. Convincing phishing vuln, but still unpatched. 2020-08-06
A probabilistic pub quiz for nerds
A “true or false” quiz where you respond with your confidence level, and the optimal strategy is to report your true belief. 2020-04-26
Time is running out to catch COVID-19
Simulation shows it’s rational to deliberately infect yourself with COVID-19 early on to get treatment, but after healthcare capacity is exceeded, it’s better to avoid infection. Includes interactive parameters and visualizations. 2020-03-14
The inception bar: a new phishing method
A new phishing technique that displays a fake URL bar in Chrome for mobile. A key innovation is the “scroll jail” that traps the user in a fake browser. 2019-04-27
The hacker hype cycle
I got started with simple web development, but because enamored with increasingly esoteric programming concepts, leading to a “trough of hipster technologies” before returning to more productive work. 2019-03-23
Project C-43: the lost origins of asymmetric crypto
Bob invents asymmetric cryptography by playing loud white noise to obscure Alice’s message, which he can cancel out but an eavesdropper cannot. This idea, published in 1944 by Walter Koenig Jr., is the forgotten origin of asymmetric crypto. 2019-02-16
How Hacker News stays interesting
Hacker News buried my post on conspiracy theories in my family due to overheated discussion, not censorship. Moderation keeps the site focused on interesting technical content. 2019-01-26
My parents are Flat-Earthers
For decades, my parents have been working up to Flat-Earther beliefs. From Egyptology to Jehovah’s Witnesses to theories that human built the Moon billions of years in the future. Surprisingly, it doesn’t affect their successful lives very much. For me, it’s a fun family pastime. 2019-01-20
The dots do matter: how to scam a Gmail user
Gmail’s “dots don’t matter” feature lets scammers create an account on, say, Netflix, with your email address but different dots. Results in convincing phishing emails. 2018-04-07
The sorry state of OpenSSL usability
OpenSSL’s inadequate documentation, confusing key formats, and deprecated interfaces make it difficult to use, despite its importance. 2017-12-02
I hate telephones
I hate telephones. Some rational reasons: lack of authentication, no spam filtering, forced synchronous communication. But also just a visceral fear. 2017-11-08
The Three Ts of Time, Thought and Typing: measuring cost on the web
Businesses often tout “free” services, but the real costs come in terms of time, thought, and typing required from users. Reducing these “Three Ts” is key to improving sign-up flows and increasing conversions. 2017-10-26
Granddad died today
Granddad died. The unspoken practice of death-by-dehydration in the NHS. The Liverpool Care Pathway. Assisted dying in the UK. The importance of planning in end-of-life care. 2017-05-19
How do I call a program in C, setting up standard pipes?
A C function to create a new process, set up its standard input/output/error pipes, and return a struct containing the process ID and pipe file descriptors. 2017-02-17
Your syntax highlighter is wrong
Syntax highlighters make value judgments about code. Most highlighters judge that comments are cruft, and try to hide them. Most diff viewers judge that code deletions are bad. 2014-05-11
Want to build a fantastic product using LLMs? I work at
Granola where we're building the future IDE for knowledge work. Come and work with us!
Read more or
get in touch! This page copyright James Fisher 2019. Content is not associated with my employer. Found an error? Edit this page.